My name is Bharani and I am a neurologist who specialises in multiple sclerosis in the Boston area.
It takes a lot for a doctor to even contemplate suing the sitting Attorney General of a state.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey has hurt me a lot and she deliberately broke both state and Federal law to do so. She also terrified my elderly parents by an unprovoked ambush on my home by two of Maura’s investigators who came intent on immediately physically carrying away my computers and my patients’ “complete page-by-page” medical records.
Naturally I refused as doing so would have been totally unlawful.
Unlike Maura, I am not prepared to violate the law and my patients’ privacy rights.
As I wrote in the lawsuit complaint - “The degree of lawlessness at the level of the Massachusetts Attorney General that has been laid out with particularity in this complaint should not be tolerated.”
Maura broke the law to help her client in a private civil lawsuit, a James Paikos, who routinely violates the law himself at the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine.
The case involves intentional violations of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Stored Communications Act.
You may read and download the complaint here -> DOWNLOAD CASE # 1:15-CV-13297-NMG
As the case proceeds please check back for fresh documents and updates. I shall post original documents here for everyone to follow along.
Thank you for reading about this case!
Bharani Padmanabhan MD PhD
When Maura sent her thugs to my home and scared my elderly parents she sent them with the express intention of intimidating us and stealing my files unlawfully.
The woman officer who accompanied Investigator Chris Cecchini was there to provide muscle.
My mother described her as a prison guard. Maura and the rest at the Attorney General's Office have kept her identity hidden to this day.
Even though the AGO accepted service for her, she was not named or included in the AGO's Motion to enlarge time to answer.
I therefore filed a Motion for Entry of Default against this Jane Doe.
| Maura Healey responds to my seeking Default against Jane Doe
Which is interesting given they have refused to identify or represent Jane Doe.
There were severe problems in their Response as well.
DOWNLOAD Document 20
Went ahead and filed the Motion for Sanctions against Maura Healey and others on November 6th, 2015.
As of this moment, November 13th, 2015, the total silence continues.
|As expected, Judge Nathaniel Gorton has not responded to my Motion for Clarification.
On March 2, 2016, I went ahead and filed my APPEAL with the US 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.
| Maura Healey asked for and was granted time till June 17, 2016, to file her answer brief.
I fully expected Maura would NOT file an answer brief and would file a motion for summary affirmance instead. In fact I warned the Court of this in a motion - Download Document 55
On June 17, 2016, fully as I expected and warned the court, Maura filed a motion for summary disposition instead of an answer brief - Download Document 56
Maura also filed a motion to further extend time for her to file an answer brief! Download Document 57
I immediately filed an objection to this deliberate delay tactic and demanded my day in open court - Download Document 58